<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tweets as open source network management metric</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.openxtra.co.uk/blog/tweets-as-open-source-network-management-metric/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.openxtra.co.uk/blog/tweets-as-open-source-network-management-metric/</link>
	<description>Your daily IT cuppa</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 00:33:39 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mark Hinkle</title>
		<link>http://www.openxtra.co.uk/blog/tweets-as-open-source-network-management-metric/#comment-6087</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Hinkle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 17:15:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openxtra.co.uk/blog/tweets-as-open-source-network-management-metric/#comment-6087</guid>
		<description>@Jack - I do agree it's great fun. For example, I like to Google Fight. To your point about Nagios, I'll even take my lumps here (for now):

http://tinyurl.com/2vn6vq

;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jack - I do agree it&#8217;s great fun. For example, I like to Google Fight. To your point about Nagios, I&#8217;ll even take my lumps here (for now):</p>
<p><a href="http://tinyurl.com/2vn6vq" >http://tinyurl.com/2vn6vq</a></p>
<p> <img src='http://www.openxtra.co.uk/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Hughes</title>
		<link>http://www.openxtra.co.uk/blog/tweets-as-open-source-network-management-metric/#comment-6086</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Hughes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 17:05:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openxtra.co.uk/blog/tweets-as-open-source-network-management-metric/#comment-6086</guid>
		<description>@Mark - I agree, I think the tool is more interesting than the data in this instance. Nagios &#038; twitter would seem to bear out that if you're in early enough you're pretty tough to overhaul. I can't think of anything that has been less reliable than twitter...doesn't seem to have done it any harm though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Mark - I agree, I think the tool is more interesting than the data in this instance. Nagios &#038; twitter would seem to bear out that if you&#8217;re in early enough you&#8217;re pretty tough to overhaul. I can&#8217;t think of anything that has been less reliable than twitter&#8230;doesn&#8217;t seem to have done it any harm though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Hinkle</title>
		<link>http://www.openxtra.co.uk/blog/tweets-as-open-source-network-management-metric/#comment-6085</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Hinkle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 16:50:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openxtra.co.uk/blog/tweets-as-open-source-network-management-metric/#comment-6085</guid>
		<description>Interesting metric Jack. I think that it's a long ways away before we start looking at Twitter to measure popularity especially at those numbers. I am more interested in the Tweet Volume as a cool tool on top of Twitter. I saw another neat Twitter tool last week called Tweet Peek - http://www.twitterpeek.com that collates all the tweets for a specified group. That would be interesting to track all open source management companies/projects as a whole. I'll try to set one up in my "free" time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting metric Jack. I think that it&#8217;s a long ways away before we start looking at Twitter to measure popularity especially at those numbers. I am more interested in the Tweet Volume as a cool tool on top of Twitter. I saw another neat Twitter tool last week called Tweet Peek - <a href="http://www.twitterpeek.com" >http://www.twitterpeek.com</a> that collates all the tweets for a specified group. That would be interesting to track all open source management companies/projects as a whole. I&#8217;ll try to set one up in my &#8220;free&#8221; time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets as open source network management metric</title>
		<link>http://www.openxtra.co.uk/blog/tweets-as-open-source-network-management-metric/#comment-6083</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets as open source network management metric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 09:33:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openxtra.co.uk/blog/tweets-as-open-source-network-management-metric/#comment-6083</guid>
		<description>[...] [Technorati] Tag results for opensource wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerpt The folks over at TweetVOLUME have produced a tool for counting the mentions of words or phrases on the Twitter micro-blogging platform. I thought that it would be an interesting, though not especially significant, metric for comparing open source projects. The graph above shows the number of twits in which Zenoss, Nagios, Hyperic, OpenNMS or MRTG were mentioned according to the TweetVolume algorithm. The graph once again shows that Nagios is ahead of everybody. The rest are too close to d [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] [Technorati] Tag results for opensource wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerpt The folks over at TweetVOLUME have produced a tool for counting the mentions of words or phrases on the Twitter micro-blogging platform. I thought that it would be an interesting, though not especially significant, metric for comparing open source projects. The graph above shows the number of twits in which Zenoss, Nagios, Hyperic, OpenNMS or MRTG were mentioned according to the TweetVolume algorithm. The graph once again shows that Nagios is ahead of everybody. The rest are too close to d [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
