<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Open source network management download comparison</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.openxtra.co.uk/blog/open-source-network-management-download-comparison/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.openxtra.co.uk/blog/open-source-network-management-download-comparison/</link>
	<description>Your daily IT cuppa</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 00:41:34 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: David Hustace</title>
		<link>http://www.openxtra.co.uk/blog/open-source-network-management-download-comparison/#comment-6275</link>
		<dc:creator>David Hustace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 12:31:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openxtra.co.uk/blog/open-source-network-management-download-comparison/#comment-6275</guid>
		<description>I hope by now that the IT bloggers have stopped using source forge download count as a metric.  These numbers can be gamed, they obviously are, and don't represent actual usage (for too many reasons to post here), and some open source applications actually fold into the packaging systems of the host platform: "yum  opennms" ; "apt-get  opennms" hits the yum/apt repositories by passing SourceForge.  Installing packages by downloading from SourceForge is a system administrator's worst nightmare.  Some of the NMS applications have to be downloaded from SourceForge and then built and installed missing the packaging system all together.  They often also include dependency software (i.e. RRD, PostgreSQL) that should be installed by packaging for security and software inventory reasons.

Good luck with your RRD project.  Looking forward to seeing that (grin).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope by now that the IT bloggers have stopped using source forge download count as a metric.  These numbers can be gamed, they obviously are, and don&#8217;t represent actual usage (for too many reasons to post here), and some open source applications actually fold into the packaging systems of the host platform: &#8220;yum  opennms&#8221; ; &#8220;apt-get  opennms&#8221; hits the yum/apt repositories by passing SourceForge.  Installing packages by downloading from SourceForge is a system administrator&#8217;s worst nightmare.  Some of the NMS applications have to be downloaded from SourceForge and then built and installed missing the packaging system all together.  They often also include dependency software (i.e. RRD, PostgreSQL) that should be installed by packaging for security and software inventory reasons.</p>
<p>Good luck with your RRD project.  Looking forward to seeing that (grin).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Hughes</title>
		<link>http://www.openxtra.co.uk/blog/open-source-network-management-download-comparison/#comment-5954</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Hughes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 17:07:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openxtra.co.uk/blog/open-source-network-management-download-comparison/#comment-5954</guid>
		<description>@Axel - If I'd tried to put *every* open source tool on the graph then it would have been very hard to discern any information. I was trying to compare the "new wave" with a couple of the better known "old wave" projects.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Axel - If I&#8217;d tried to put *every* open source tool on the graph then it would have been very hard to discern any information. I was trying to compare the &#8220;new wave&#8221; with a couple of the better known &#8220;old wave&#8221; projects.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Axel</title>
		<link>http://www.openxtra.co.uk/blog/open-source-network-management-download-comparison/#comment-5953</link>
		<dc:creator>Axel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 16:16:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openxtra.co.uk/blog/open-source-network-management-download-comparison/#comment-5953</guid>
		<description>I'm missing at least three other network monitoring systems:

+ Quest Big Brother (Open Source, but not really free): http://bb4.org/

+ Hobbit (GNU GPL, a enhanced rewite of BB in C): http://hobbitmon.sourceforge.net/

+ Pandora Free Monitoring System (FMS): http://pandora.sourceforge.net/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m missing at least three other network monitoring systems:</p>
<p>+ Quest Big Brother (Open Source, but not really free): <a href="http://bb4.org/" >http://bb4.org/</a></p>
<p>+ Hobbit (GNU GPL, a enhanced rewite of BB in C): <a href="http://hobbitmon.sourceforge.net/" >http://hobbitmon.sourceforge.net/</a></p>
<p>+ Pandora Free Monitoring System (FMS): <a href="http://pandora.sourceforge.net/" >http://pandora.sourceforge.net/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zenoss Blog &#187; Milestones</title>
		<link>http://www.openxtra.co.uk/blog/open-source-network-management-download-comparison/#comment-5951</link>
		<dc:creator>Zenoss Blog &#187; Milestones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 12:45:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openxtra.co.uk/blog/open-source-network-management-download-comparison/#comment-5951</guid>
		<description>[...] many choices in closed and open source for IT monitoring/management, we are proud that Zenoss has risen to the top. For what our users tell us, the uptake is driven the very real desire in IT for new options to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] many choices in closed and open source for IT monitoring/management, we are proud that Zenoss has risen to the top. For what our users tell us, the uptake is driven the very real desire in IT for new options to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: People Over Process &#187; links for 2007-11-07</title>
		<link>http://www.openxtra.co.uk/blog/open-source-network-management-download-comparison/#comment-5251</link>
		<dc:creator>People Over Process &#187; links for 2007-11-07</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 07:21:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openxtra.co.uk/blog/open-source-network-management-download-comparison/#comment-5251</guid>
		<description>[...] Open source network management download comparison From SourceForge numbers, Nagios and Zenoss have the top downloads. (tags: itmanagement opensource numbers sourceforge nagios zenoss hyperic opennms groundwork) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Open source network management download comparison From SourceForge numbers, Nagios and Zenoss have the top downloads. (tags: itmanagement opensource numbers sourceforge nagios zenoss hyperic opennms groundwork) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Open source network management download comparison &#171; FR Test Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.openxtra.co.uk/blog/open-source-network-management-download-comparison/#comment-5245</link>
		<dc:creator>Open source network management download comparison &#171; FR Test Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 21:31:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openxtra.co.uk/blog/open-source-network-management-download-comparison/#comment-5245</guid>
		<description>[...] source network management download&#160;comparison    Open source network management download comparison I entered the download data from sourceforge for the last year into a Google Spreadsheet. I then [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] source network management download&nbsp;comparison    Open source network management download comparison I entered the download data from sourceforge for the last year into a Google Spreadsheet. I then [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
