Open source network management buzz comparison 2009

by Jack Hughes on January 7, 2010

I did a comparison of the buzz for the leading open source network management tools in 2008 so I thought it would be interesting to do the same comparison for 2009 and see what’s changed.

As I did last year, I’ve compared the number of searches for the project name using Google Trends. As always, this post is not intended to be indicative of the usefulness of a particular tool to your requirements.

Open Source Network Management System Trends

Firstly a comparison of the major players in open source network management: Zenoss, Hyperic, Nagios, MRTG and OpenNMS. The most striking thing about the graph to me is the decline in searches for Nagios. From the middle of 2009 things have been declining quite steeply. MRTG has been declining though it just looks like a continuation of the decline evident for the last few years.

Open Source Network Management System Trend 2009

A Comparison of the Nagios Ecosystem

Whilst the above graph showed a reduction in the relative number of searches for Nagios, perhaps the Nagios ecosystem graph can explain it. Icinga, a Nagios fork, was created during 2009 and may be responsible for at least some of the decline. Icinga appears on the graph during late April and has a steady presence throughout the rest of 2009 save for a small period during the Christmas break.

A Comparison of the Nagios Ecosystem 2009

Open vs Closed Network Management Systems

Given that 2009 was a year of recession in many countries, perhaps it won’t surprise too many to see so many of  both the commercial open source and proprietary tools trending downwards. I suspect that 2009 was a tough year for winkling money out of IT budgets.

Open vs Closed Network Management Systems 2009

Conclusion

All in all an interesting year. Apart from the Icinga/Nagios episode it seems odd that none of the tools has made  significant progress during 2009. If open source tools were to make a move against their proprietary cousins you would assume it would be 2009 given the economic background. Budgets have been tight, so why haven’t open source tools made progress in these recessionary times?

Popularity: 6% [?]

Share and Enjoy:
  • del.icio.us
  • Twitter

Related posts:

  1. Open source network management buzz comparison 2008
  2. Tivoli vs open source network management buzz 2008
  3. Open source network management download comparison
  4. “New wave” network management buzz comparison

{ 2 trackbacks }

Open source network management buzz comparison 2009 | Open Hacking
January 7, 2010 at 7:58 PM
Network Management System - Topic Research, Trends and Surveys
February 3, 2010 at 10:52 PM

{ 7 comments… read them below or add one }

Twirrim January 7, 2010 at 4:13 PM

I grabbed a quick comparison with one of my preferred monitoring tools, Zabbix. On comparitive scale it’s doing better than hyperic, zenoss and opennms, but it’s also pretty stagnant on search percentage, even with the release of 1.8 last month.

Jack Hughes January 7, 2010 at 4:28 PM

@Twirrim – good point. Zabbix does seem to get overlooked quite often which is a shame.

Old Man Winter January 7, 2010 at 4:35 PM

Implementing this kind of technology takes a lot of time, whether or not you’re paying for it is kind of irrelevant. If my business is struggling am I going to want my staff screwing around with some management software that makes their lives easier but doesn’t make me money? No of course not. Well make if it means I can fire a few of them and still get the work done, but otherwise, this kind of software is reserved for boon times not hard times.

Jack Hughes January 7, 2010 at 4:53 PM

@Old Man Winter – my suspicion is that an awful lot of businesses have had enough things to cope with last year.

monitor January 7, 2010 at 8:43 PM

Maybe it is worth redoing the graphs with Zabbix included?
I did a quick check, and it seems to be in the same range as most of the viewed solutions.

NetMan January 8, 2010 at 6:44 AM

Nagios Enhancement – Opsview ( http://opsview.org ) rules. :)

Jack Hughes January 8, 2010 at 9:15 AM

@monitor – the main aim of the post was to see the differences between 2009 and the previous post for 2008. The previous post didn’t include Zabbix.

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: