<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Open source network management activity comparison</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.openxtra.co.uk/blog/open-source-network-management-activity-comparison/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.openxtra.co.uk/blog/open-source-network-management-activity-comparison/</link>
	<description>Your daily IT cuppa</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 23 Jan 2011 07:05:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Open source network management activity comparison &#124; The Linux Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.openxtra.co.uk/blog/open-source-network-management-activity-comparison/comment-page-1/#comment-7170</link>
		<dc:creator>Open source network management activity comparison &#124; The Linux Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 13:34:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openxtra.co.uk/blog/?p=1276#comment-7170</guid>
		<description>[...] Here is the original: Open source network management activity comparison [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Here is the original: Open source network management activity comparison [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Hughes</title>
		<link>http://www.openxtra.co.uk/blog/open-source-network-management-activity-comparison/comment-page-1/#comment-7168</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Hughes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 14:09:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openxtra.co.uk/blog/?p=1276#comment-7168</guid>
		<description>@Tarus, nice to see you back. Quite agree... if you want a vibrant open source project it is kinda hard to see how you can do that without heavy community involvement in all roles. If you&#039;re focused on an open core strategy with a proprietary offering then you still need a community but it is likely to be a different animal from a traditional open source community like the ones surrounding OpenNMS and Wireshark for instance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Tarus, nice to see you back. Quite agree&#8230; if you want a vibrant open source project it is kinda hard to see how you can do that without heavy community involvement in all roles. If you&#8217;re focused on an open core strategy with a proprietary offering then you still need a community but it is likely to be a different animal from a traditional open source community like the ones surrounding OpenNMS and Wireshark for instance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tarus</title>
		<link>http://www.openxtra.co.uk/blog/open-source-network-management-activity-comparison/comment-page-1/#comment-7167</link>
		<dc:creator>Tarus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 13:30:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openxtra.co.uk/blog/?p=1276#comment-7167</guid>
		<description>Interesting comparison. Although lately a lot of negativity has been aimed at the value of &quot;community,&quot; I am humbled that we have 43 people with commit access to OpenNMS. It is key to our success.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting comparison. Although lately a lot of negativity has been aimed at the value of &#8220;community,&#8221; I am humbled that we have 43 people with commit access to OpenNMS. It is key to our success.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

